Assurance, not just insurance.

In Tanzania, roughly 89% of people have no health insurance at all. That is not because insurance doesn’t exist — it’s because the traditional model of health insurance has never worked well in this market, and understanding why is the first step to understanding what STP actually is.

Traditional health insurance was built for a different environment: dense networks of clinics and hospitals, established claims history to price risk against, and low enough fraud that premiums can stay affordable. In much of Sub-Saharan Africa, none of those three things reliably exist. Physical healthcare infrastructure is thin, especially in rural areas. There’s little historical claims data to price a new policy against. And claims fraud runs high — commonly estimated at around 50% of cases in this market — which pushes premiums up for everyone.

The result: insurance in this market has historically had to be expensive, cautious, and slow to expand — which is exactly why so few people have it. STP exists because there’s a different way to control the underlying cost, rather than just processing claims after the fact.

“Triage” is a medical term for a simple idea: before deciding how to treat someone, first work out what’s actually wrong with them, and how serious it is. It’s the conversation that happens before treatment, not the treatment itself.

In most healthcare systems — including the traditional insurance model in Tanzania — that first step doesn’t really happen in any structured way. A person feels unwell, so they go to a clinic or hospital. Every case, however minor, walks through the same expensive front door. A cold gets the same physical visit as an urgent emergency, because there’s no earlier point where the two get separated.

The concept behind the STP service is exactly that checkpoint, applied to healthcare: an online consultation with a real doctor, available immediately, before anyone is sent to a physical facility. Every case is taken seriously as it comes in — there’s no sorting of cases into important or unimportant at the door. Most are fully resolved right there, in minutes. The rest simply need to continue further — a physical examination, a lab test, a hospital bed — and are referred onward.

The concept of insurance should be the assurance to receive medical attention 24/7, wherever you are. STP is built around delivering that directly, not just reimbursing for its absence after something has already gone wrong.

Traditional insurance — in Tanzania and almost everywhere else — works reactively. A member gets sick, visits a provider, a claim is filed, and the insurer pays it after the fact. The insurer’s only real lever for controlling cost is reviewing claims once they already exist: checking them for fraud, disputing ones that look wrong, negotiating rates with hospitals. All of that happens downstream, after the expensive visit has already occurred — and after the member has already had to find care on their own.

This is only possible now because the enabling infrastructure — affordable smartphones and mobile data coverage widespread enough to reach hundreds of thousands of people at once — has only recently existed across East Africa. What’s new is turning phone-based symptom description into a structured, digital, at-scale system that an insurer can price and build a cost-control model around.

To understand why STP can be priced so much lower than traditional cover, it helps to follow a single case through the system, step by step, and see where the money actually goes.

And that $35 “today” figure already has a serious problem built into it: fraud. Industry estimates put claims fraud in this market at around 50% of cases — things like one person’s insurance being used by someone else, or costs being inflated between patient and provider. Because every case is triaged and identity-verified digitally from the very first contact, this eliminates roughly 90% of that fraud before it ever becomes a claim.

Two terms are worth defining before the pricing makes sense. A “premium” is what a member pays, usually monthly, to be covered. The “loss ratio” is the share of that premium money that actually gets spent on care — total cost of claims, divided by total premium collected. Insurers generally consider a loss ratio of around 60–70% healthy: high enough that members are getting real value, low enough that there’s room left for administration and a margin of safety.

Here’s the arithmetic in plain terms. If 100,000 people each pay $4 a month, that’s $400,000 coming in every month. STP’s own observed usage is about 0.91 visits per person per year — less than once a year on average. At roughly $10.71 per case, that works out to about $81,000 a month in actual claims cost against $400,000 in premium — a loss ratio around 20%, comfortably below the 60–70% zone insurers look for.

Every insurance product carries a risk: what if people use it more than expected? The “break-even point” is the usage level at which a plan stops comfortably covering its claims — and the gap between today’s real usage and that break-even point is the plan’s margin of safety.

In other words, usage would have to rise roughly 3.5x before the pricing came under real pressure. That’s a substantial cushion, and it exists specifically because triage screens out the unnecessary and fraudulent cases that would otherwise eat into it.

Compare that to the traditional model at the same $4/month price: its break-even sits at just 0.96 visits per year — almost exactly where usage already is today, with almost no room for a bad season. STP isn’t just cheaper. It’s the only version of this product with a real safety margin at all.

With the reasoning in place, the product itself is simple to state. STP is a standalone health insurance product built entirely on the triage model explained above — nothing more, nothing hidden.

• Access to online triage consultations with a real doctor, limited to 5 consultations per year.
• Automatic referral to a physical facility whenever a case needs to continue there.
• The same clinical and cost model described above — no separate systems, no separate pricing logic.
• Two fixed premium options: $3/person/month (Essential) and $5/person/month (Complete) — no bundling, no sponsor, no intermediary required.

Everything above describes an economic model — why triage-first pricing works, and at what price. But a model only matters if something can actually carry it: a vehicle capable of handling real volume, in real time, for hundreds of thousands of people at once, without cost or complexity growing at the same pace as membership.

That vehicle needs three things a traditional insurer doesn’t build for itself: a digital front door patients actually use, a network of doctors available immediately rather than by appointment, and infrastructure that scales by adding capacity, not by adding buildings. This is where the MedicasONE digital solution comes into play:

• A digital triage front door — the same app and process a member uses whether the case resolves in minutes or needs a referral.
• A live network of licensed doctors, available on demand rather than scheduled — the mechanism that makes 9-in-10 same-visit resolution possible in the first place.
• A shared clinical record behind every case, so referrals carry context instead of starting from zero at the physical facility.
• Cloud-based infrastructure that scales by adding doctor capacity and server capacity — not clinics or hospital beds — which is why cost per case stays flat as membership grows from thousands to hundreds of thousands.

STP isn’t a new system waiting to be built. It’s a pricing and packaging layer on top of a vehicle that already exists, already runs, and already carries this exact model today.

Everything described so far is a model of how the economics work. It’s worth being clear that it runs on infrastructure that already exists and is already operating — this is not a plan for something to be built.

The model above isn’t a projection for an untested idea — it’s the same clinical and operational infrastructure MedicasONE has run since 2013, applied to a new market and a new price point.

The case so far has been financial. But the same triage-first structure also changes outcomes for patients and communities in ways that have nothing to do with cost.

All this, from the comfort of the client’s home.

• Traditional insurance in this market is expensive because it controls cost after a claim already exists, and because fraud runs high without it.
• Triage — checking a case before it becomes a physical visit — resolves 9 in 10 cases immediately and screens out most fraud before it becomes a cost at all.
• That drops the average cost per case from about $35 to about $10.71 — and further, to roughly $9.93, once the fraud-adjusted referral share is priced in.
• At that lower cost, a $3–$5 monthly premium comfortably covers real claims — loss ratios of roughly 16–27%, well inside a healthy range.
• Real usage sits far below the point where that pricing would come under pressure — a safety margin the traditional model simply doesn’t have.